| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
1. Eve Miners Guide to the New Order of Highsec (A.K.A. James 315 and his gang), Pa... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: S Byerley wrote: baltec1 wrote: RomeStar wrote: Hey genius its only a bannable offence if you delete the character due to a low sec status. Pulling concord off the belt doesnt count or all gankers would be banned for pu...
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.12 19:13:00
|
2. Will there ever be a change to EVE's piloting mechanics? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Letting the the AI try to orbit something with a higher top speed but lower agility is the 2nd most annoying thing ever. Second only to doing it manually with double-clicking.
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.11 02:58:00
|
3. [xXPIZZAXx] Ganking fleets public - in Crime and Punishment [original thread]
Good guy PIZZA popularizing freighter ganking so that the requirements get nerfed to something more reasonable? I can dig it.
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.11 01:32:00
|
4. Sticky:GM clarification on rewording of the Terms of Service - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
EVE ToS wrote: CCP reserves the right to close, temporarily or permanently, any userGÇÖs account without advance notice as we deem necessary. Furthermore, we reserve the right to delete all user accounts or inventory of characters as warranted....
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.10 23:39:00
|
5. Eve Miners Guide to the New Order of Highsec (A.K.A. James 315 and his gang), Pa... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: RomeStar wrote: baltec1 wrote: Kharmha wrote: even to the point of using throwaway toons to purposely draw concord ships to the belts simply for the protection from gankers they gave. There are two bannable offenc...
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.10 23:10:00
|
6. Eve Miners Guide to the New Order of Highsec (A.K.A. James 315 and his gang), Pa... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lady Areola Fappington wrote: You're pretty much exactly wrong with that statement, my risk averse highsec friend. CCP, and by extension the mod team, get quite antsy and delete happy even if you post a conceptual exploit, that isn't yet in th...
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.10 10:01:00
|
7. Already?! Nerf Ishkurs too Stronk! - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
"stronk" is this generation's "noob" Bet that makes some people feel old.
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.10 09:36:00
|
8. Eve Miners Guide to the New Order of Highsec (A.K.A. James 315 and his gang), Pa... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Ok I'll rephrase that, I'm not directly discussing forum moderation. What I am doing is using previously moderated posts, and their unredacted versions, as examples to suggest that the pre spawning of Concord for prot...
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.10 09:24:00
|
9. Eve Miners Guide to the New Order of Highsec (A.K.A. James 315 and his gang), Pa... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: Forum moderation is outside of the purview of this thread, I'm not discussing it. Your argument is based on forum moderation; you're already discussing it.
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.10 09:13:00
|
10. Eve Miners Guide to the New Order of Highsec (A.K.A. James 315 and his gang), Pa... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Lady Areola Fappington wrote: I've also seen a few of our targets come back from their non-consensual vacations, screaming about how unfair it was that they were just "protecting themselves" with CONCORD and copped a suspension for it. Sound...
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.10 09:12:00
|
11. Eve Miners Guide to the New Order of Highsec (A.K.A. James 315 and his gang), Pa... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: The only difference, from what's been suggested here, being the OP was using a trial account to do the do. While I think that should be an issue, there are lots of examples that nothing of that nature is enforced in ...
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.10 09:01:00
|
12. Eve Miners Guide to the New Order of Highsec (A.K.A. James 315 and his gang), Pa... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Jonah Gravenstein wrote: S Byerley wrote: Mostly ridicule, also a little bit of misdirection. The suggestions are always wildly impractical so it really doesn't hurt any. Pre-spawning Concord, in contrast, is very cost-eff...
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.10 08:11:00
|
13. Eve Miners Guide to the New Order of Highsec (A.K.A. James 315 and his gang), Pa... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: S Byerley wrote: Mostly ridicule, also a little bit of misdirection. The suggestions are always wildly impractical so it really doesn't hurt any. Pre-spawning Concord, in contrast, is very cost-effective and can be ...
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.10 07:42:00
|
14. Eve Miners Guide to the New Order of Highsec (A.K.A. James 315 and his gang), Pa... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jonah Gravenstein wrote: S Byerley wrote: Benny Ohu wrote: Also, I'm stil not entirely clear on this. Is pulling CONCORD onto grid for protection once an exploit? What motivation could a suicide ganker possibly have to convince you t...
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.10 07:28:00
|
15. Eve Miners Guide to the New Order of Highsec (A.K.A. James 315 and his gang), Pa... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Benny Ohu wrote: Also, I'm stil not entirely clear on this. Is pulling CONCORD onto grid for protection once an exploit? What motivation could a suicide ganker possibly have to convince you that a suicide ganking defense is an exploit?
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.10 07:12:00
|
16. Eve Miners Guide to the New Order of Highsec (A.K.A. James 315 and his gang), Pa... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: S Byerley wrote: And I just call bullshit on the second one; if you can suicide to pull concord off grid, miners can suicide to pull concord on grid. CCP has never publicly said anything else and it's a downright dumb notion...
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.10 06:23:00
|
17. Eve Miners Guide to the New Order of Highsec (A.K.A. James 315 and his gang), Pa... - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Kharmha wrote: even to the point of using throwaway toons to purposely draw concord ships to the belts simply for the protection from gankers they gave. There are two bannable offences being used here. According to y...
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.10 06:11:00
|
18. CFC disband - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Leigh Akiga wrote: and capitals dont get put at risk with PL lurking about, etc. grrr PL caps
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.08 21:27:00
|
19. CFC disband - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Leigh Akiga wrote: Condordia Apoclypia wrote: Abdullah Bahdoon wrote: Is it true? There are some rumors circulating around EveO that CFC will fall from the inside... Just wanted to know if it's bogus or not. yes tey all playing LoL atm...
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.08 21:10:00
|
20. Nighthawk - the 'constructive' thread - how Fraked it is. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Tippia wrote: It was 6 turrets, +25% kinetic damage, -25% cycle time = 10 base launchers worth of damage output. Now, it's 5 turrets, +37.5% kinetic damage, -37.5% cycle time = 11 base launchers worth of damage output. Good call; eyeballed i...
- by S Byerley - at 2013.09.08 11:02:00
|
| Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |